Structural vs. Functional Deficits in Neurological Conditions
When evaluating neurological conditions, neurologists and physicians use a variety of techniques, including, physical examination, x-rays, EEGs, CT scans, PET-scans, and MRI scans. Over the years, these evaluations have become more and more sophisticated and accurate. Nevertheless, these assessments are still limited, in that they frequently fail to identify brain dysfunction.
One reason why x-rays and brain scan may miss the presence of brain dysfunction is that these assessments are designed primarily to identify structural deficits in the brain. They will identify structural abnormalities such as the presence of a skull fracture, haematoma, contusions on the brain, asymmetry of the brain, and so on. The findings from these assessments can be likened to photographs showing the dents and broken structures of a car after an accident. In the absence of observable structural defects, one cannot tell, just by looking at the photograph of it, whether the car can move or not. Neuropsychological evaluations are useful in that they help to identify functional deficits of the brain. They evaluate the brain in action. For example, it is a common finding from neuropsychological tests that although the CT scan could not find any structural abnormalities. Neurologists also evaluate functional deficits, with techniques such as EEGs and blood flow studies. Neuropsychological evaluations are an important complement to these measures.
Diagnostic role for neuropsychology
Quantifying progress with neuropsychological tests
What functions do neuropsychologists evaluate?
Neuropsychological evaluations cover the following areas:
1. Sensory and Motor functions
This covers assessment of perception in the visual, auditory, tactile, and olfactory senses. Motor function involves assessment of grip strength, and assessment of motor dexterity.
Above is a picture the hand dynamometer (by LEFAYETTE), one of the devices used to assess motor functions in patients. The patient grips and squeezes the lever as hard as he or she can. This moves the pointer, indicating the extent of force used in kilograms, which is referred to as grip strength. Assessment of grip strength is important in neurological evaluations because it helps us to document whether or not there is a weakness of the limbs.
2. Verbal functions and Language Skills
The tests used here are for the evaluation of aphasia, verbal expression, and verbal academic skills.
3. Cognitive functions
4. Evaluation of executive functions of the brain
By the term "executive functions" is meant the brain's ability to formulate goals, to determine strategies for achieving the goal, to implement the strategies, and to evaluate one's performance against the original goals (Luria, 1973).
The executive functions depend on an intact frontal lobe. (see OVERVIEW OF BRAIN FUNCTIONS)
5. Behavioural and personality evaluation
We interview patients and/ or their relatives or employers to document whether or not there has been any significant changes in behaviour. Frontal and temporal lobe damage are frequently associated with major changes in behaviour, such as lack of motivation, disinhibition, and irritability.
Third Party Evaluations: Motor Vehicle Accidents
In cases of traumatic brain injury from motor vehicle accidents, neuropsychologists are frequently asked to write medico-legal reports for the courts. We receive referrals come either from lawyers, or directly from the Road Accident Fund.
Copyright © 2001, Dr. J.F.L.
Mureriwa. All rights reserved.
www.biofeedback.co.za